SPF50+ and Vitamin D: The Sun-D Trial
SkinArticleThe Australian trial found a modest difference in blood levels and more participants below its deficiency threshold. Sun protection still belongs in the discussion.

In this article
A higher-SPF question
Sun-D tested the Australian practice of applying SPF50+ sunscreen during the morning routine on days when the UV index was forecast to reach 3 or higher. The research institute describes it as the first large trial examining SPF50+ use and vitamin D.1
What changed in the blood tests
The 2025 open-label trial randomized 639 adults aged 18 to 70 who were not routinely using sunscreen or vitamin-D supplements. Of the 628 analysed, 66.1% were female; the median age was 52. The comparison was routine sunscreen versus discretionary use, not sunscreen versus a ban on sun protection.2
Blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D increased by an adjusted average of 1.6 nmol/L in the sunscreen group and 6.8 nmol/L in controls. The between-group effect was −5.2 nmol/L, not a 5.2-point fall within the sunscreen group.2
At the final sample, 45.7% of the sunscreen group versus 36.9% of controls were below the study’s 50 nmol/L deficiency threshold. That is an 8.8-percentage-point difference. Deficiency was an exploratory outcome.2
Skin type and vitamin-D testing
A 2026 published exchange in Australian Prescriber3 discusses the trial’s implications. The response notes limited representation of people with skin of colour and describes vitamin-D testing in regular sunscreen users as a matter of clinical judgment. The trial does not settle a single sun-protection or blood-testing rule for every skin type and location.3
Bring the question to the appointment with specifics: your sunscreen routine, time outdoors, clothing coverage, previous vitamin-D results and any supplements already taken. Ask whether testing or supplementation is appropriate for your situation. A result reported below a study threshold does not tell you which supplement dose to choose.
Keep vitamin D and UV protection in the same plan
In its response to Sun-D, Cancer Council Australia4 continued to recommend sun protection and advised people to discuss vitamin-D management with a doctor. It explicitly cautioned against excessive UV exposure even when vitamin D is low.4
Its Australian advice at UV index 3 or above combines protective clothing, SPF50 or SPF50+ broad-spectrum water-resistant sunscreen, a broad-brimmed hat, shade and sunglasses. Sunscreen is one part of that arrangement.4
Skin, Head to Toe places sunscreen on the short product Shelf in Chapter 5. If you already have a routine, take its details to the vitamin-D conversation rather than replacing it after reading a headline. Agree on any blood test, supplement and follow-up while keeping the purpose of each part clear.
Our earlier sunscreen and vitamin-D overview covers the older lower-SPF studies and now points to this newer trial.
Educational information. Sun-protection and vitamin-D advice should account for your location, skin, health history and existing treatment. This trial is not a reason to seek sunburn or begin high-dose supplements.
Girl Playbook sells this book. It provides education and worksheets, not individualized medical care.
Sources
The research behind this article, in the order it’s cited. How we source our articles.
- QIMR Berghofer, Accessed 2026Sun-D Trial (opens in a new tab)↩
- British Journal of Dermatology, 2025Effect of daily sunscreen application on vitamin D: findings from the open-label randomized controlled Sun-D Trial (opens in a new tab)abc
- Australian Prescriber, 2026Sunscreen, vitamin D and skin of colour: letter and authors’ response (opens in a new tab)ab
- Cancer Council Australia, 2025New research on Vitamin D and sunscreen empowers Australians to be sun safe (opens in a new tab)abc
Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we’ll check it.


