Eszopiclone After 65: 4 Trial Checks
Sleep & NighttimeArticleTwelve weeks of diary results need prescribing context.

In this article
Bring the study’s dose, outcome and follow-up to a prescription review. These four checks help frame that conversation.
Diary benefit
The trial assigned 388 adults aged 65–85 to nightly 2 mg eszopiclone or placebo for twelve weeks. MMSE cognition scores were ≥28; stable illnesses were allowed. Sepracor funded it; four authors worked for the company during the study.1
Registered mean sleep-diary increases were 63.24 versus 33.18 minutes, averaged across treatment assessments, P<.0001. Each arm analyzed 191 people, using carried-forward observations for missing assessments. This is not a week-twelve result from all 388 participants.2
Safety limits
Reported unpleasant taste occurred in 12.4% versus 1.5%. Blinding success was untested. No driving test was performed. The four-week stopping analysis covered selected completers; no worsening below pretreatment sleep does not establish safe abrupt stopping.1
The 2023 AGS Beers Criteria recommend avoiding Z-drugs, including eszopiclone, in older adults, citing delirium, falls, fractures and motor-vehicle crashes alongside limited sleep benefits. This is a prescribing recommendation, rather than an absolute contraindication. Ask how your fall history, cognition and other medicines affect the decision.3
Today’s label
The current US Lunesta label recommends starting at 1 mg and limits older or debilitated patients to 2 mg. Allow 7–8 hours before planned awakening. At 2 mg, next-day impairment can occur despite feeling better. Alcohol and other sedating medicines increase risk; older adults face greater fall risk.4
After sleepwalking, sleep-driving or another activity while incompletely awake, stop Lunesta and contact the prescriber immediately. Such an episode contraindicates taking it again. For an ordinary planned change, ask for instructions: the label warns of withdrawal after rapid reduction or abrupt discontinuation.4
Treatment plan
The 2026 AASM5 guideline conditionally favors starting CBT-I with medication over medication alone, but conditionally advises against routinely choosing the combination over CBT-I alone. Both recommendations have low-certainty evidence. It addresses concurrent treatment initiation, without supplying a withdrawal schedule for someone already taking a sleeping pill.5
Agree on a review date. Record grogginess, falls, sleep timing and medicines. Bring those notes to the appointment; follow your prescribed dose.
Did I Do That in My Sleep? includes “Medicines Belong in Shared Decisions,” covering expected benefits, adverse effects, interactions and review plans. Use those prompts to prepare for the appointment.
Educational information. Review prescription decisions with your clinician; follow urgent medication warnings.
Girl Playbook sells this book. It provides education and worksheets, not individualized medical care.
Sources
The research behind this article, in the order it’s cited. How we source our articles.
- Sleep, 2010Ancoli-Israel trial (opens in a new tab)ab
- ClinicalTrials.govNCT00386334 results (opens in a new tab)↩
- American Geriatrics Society, 2023Beers Criteria (opens in a new tab)↩
- DailyMed, January 2025Lunesta label (opens in a new tab)ab
- AASM, 2026Combination treatment guideline (opens in a new tab)ab
Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we’ll check it.


